From - Sat Jul 5 18:35:09 1997 From: momo@sbphy.physics.ucsb.edu (Monwhea Jeng) Newsgroups: sci.physics.electromag,sci.electronics,rec.puzzles,sci.math Subject: Re: Seven Resistor Puzzles Date: 3 Jul 97 19:51:26 GMT Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara elkies@ramanujan.harvard.edu (Noam Elkies) writes: >In article <5pcjt6$80t@clarknet.clark.net>, Keith Lynch wrote: >>Puzzle 7: Is there any arrangement of resistors which can give a >>transcendental total resistance? >Puzzle 8: Show that *any* positive real number can be obtained >as the total resistance of an arrangement of unit resistors, and >that this arrangement may be realized in the plane (without >crossings). SPOILER SPACE : Hey, neat puzzles. Given unit resistors, I can make circuits with resistance k and 1/k for all integer k>1, by hooking the resistors up in series or parallel, respectively. So for the rest of the problem assume that I have resistors of this type as well. A resistance r>0 can be written in continued fraction form : 1 1 1 1 r= k0 + --- + --- + --- + --- + . . . k1+ k2+ k3+ k4+ where the ki's are all integers, and it is understood that each fraction is nested in the one before it. i.e. r=k0+1/(k1+(1/(k2+1/(k3+1/(k4+. . .))))) To see that we can do this, write r=k0+r0, with k0 the integer part of r, and r0 the fractional part. r0=1/(1/r0), and (1/r0)>1, so we can write (1/r0)=k1+r1, where k1>1 and is an integer, and 0<=r1<1. If r1=0 we stop writing the fraction. Otherwirse 0